Interorganisational – Supply Chain Management

Now: Euroma 2009

June 17, 2009 · Leave a Comment

“Meet the editors” at Euroma: JOM and (the new) IJOPM editors declared in unison that they were most interested in theory-driven, empirically based papers. In other words, nothing that does not take its parameters at least from an actual empirical study, and nothing that just suggest yet another (consultancy) ‘methodology’. Well, IJOPM did add their quest for more conceptual pieces that would challenge existing frameworks. But while these two are trying to move up in academic quality, rigor, and citation indices, another journal has been introduced with the aim of being a solid “B” journal: OM Review. Though as Andi Smart pointed out, not as if IJOPM had ever rejected a paper with the suggestion to submit it to JOM instead :-)

What else was new? Euroma 2009 had a number of special tracks, but the most overwhelming in number of papers was the one on ops mgmt in healthcare. It ran through the entire conference and even had parallel healthcare sessions.

Gyöngyi

PS Please post the link to OM Review if you find it – I haven’t come across any direct link, just many references to the journal.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academic journals · Conferences · Journal ranking · Operations management

Trendspotting: what is hot and what is not

June 14, 2009 · 6 Comments

Trendspotting is a lovely sport. In research you can look at conference tracks, topics of current calls for papers, conduct your own survey on trends, or have a glance on which articles are downloaded the most. Downloads are interesting as they reveal not only what is read but implicitly, which topics academics currently work on. Let’s see the (convenience sample of) Emerald statistics for IJLM, IJPDLM and SCM:IJ. So here’s the what is hot in terms of being most downloaded in the first quarter of 2009 (compared to previous such lists from 2008). “Hotties” are the articles that are new or got into the spotlight in 2009, “classics” are the ones that were already in the spotlight in 2008 and continue to be there.

1. Supply chain integration (and collaboration). An outstanding paper award just went to such a topic, to Fabbe-Costes and Jahre (2008) article on SC integration (congrats!). Another outstanding hottie is Pålsson & Johansson’s (2009) SC integration through labelling that received most downloads ever within the first 6 months after publication (and has only been published in 2009, no 6 months have gone yet). Many of the classics look at characteristics of SCM and the supply chain management framework, such as Croxton et al.’s (2001) SC processes (framework), Cooper et al. (1997): SCM framework, Cooper & Ellram (1993): characteristics of SCM, Power (2005): SC integration, Fawcett et al. (2008): SC integration, New (1997) scope of SCM and collaboration such as Barratt’s (2004) SC collaboration andSandberg’s (2007) logistics collaboration.

2. Corporate social responsibility, ethics, and green/reverse supply chains (indeed moving towards more CSR and ethics focus). With hotties such as Hanafi et al. (2008) as well as van Hoek (1999) on reverse logistics, Wikner & Tang (2008) on closed-loop SC, and Andersen & Skjoett-Larsen (2009) moving towards CSR, and Svensson & Bååth (2008) towards SC ethics. The classics here are Carter & Rogers’ (2008) framework for sustainable SCM, Wu & Dunn (1995) environmentally responsible logistics, and Markley & Davis’ (1997) sustainable SCM.

3. Supply chain risk management. The hotties (new interest) are articles such as Christopher & Lee (2004) on SC risk mitigation, Khan et al. (2008) product design and SC risk, Khan & Burnes (2007) on SC risk. In addition there are a number of steady interest articles (the “classics”) on this topic such as Norrman & Jansson (2004): SC risk management at Ericsson, Manuj & Mentzer (2008) and Jüttner (2005) and Finch (2004) on SC risk management in general.

4. Lean and agile supply chains. Agility is in fashio, or at least in the fashion industry, says Masson et al. (2007). Another hottie is Christopher & Towill’s (2001) article on agility. Classics are Jones et al.’s (1997) lean logistics, and Christopher & Towill (2000) lean and agile supply chains.

5. E-commerce. Hotties such as Cho et al.’s (2008) logistics capability in e-commerce, Giménez & Lourenço (2008): e-commerce, classics: Puschmann & Alt (2005) e-procurement, Lewis et al. (2005): internet.

6. RFID. Pålsson & Johansson’s (2009) article also falls into this category. Classics are Spekman & Sweeney (2007),  Attaran (2007) and Vijayaraman & Osyk (2006).

Other topics with more interest:
(a) Value chain analysis. Hotties: Barber (2008),  Classics: Taylor (2005)
(b) Humanitarian logistics. Hotties: Kovács and Spens (2007),  Oloruntoba & Gray (2006). No classics (i.e. a very “hot topic”).
(c) Demand management. Hotties: Walters (2008). Classics: Walters (2006). (a one-man show?)
(d) Logistics outsourcing. Classics: Razzaque & Sheng (1998), Kremic et al. (2006). No hotties, though (i.e. no newcomers, no renewed interest articles).
(e) Warehousing and inventory management. Hotties: Williams & Tokar’s (2008) inventory management, Claassen et al. (2008) VMI. Classics: Nynke Faber et al. (2002) warehouse complexity, Baker (2007) inventory mgmt
(f) Transportation. Hotties: Meixell & Norbis (2008): transport mode selection, Mangan et al. (2008): port-centric logistics. Classics: Selviaridis & Spring (2007): TPL
(g) Implementation of SCM. Classics: Sridharan et al. (2005) SC implementation, Wong et al. (2005) SC toy practice. Interestingly, no hotties.

Other hotties on random topics. Notably, these are unique articles that triggered a lot of interest among readers. These are Fernie & Grant’s (2008) on-shelf availability, Shook et al.’s (2009): strategic sourcing (another breakthrough article looking at downloads of the first 6 months), and Green et al.’s (2008) logistics performance.

Other classics. Mangan et al. (2004): qualitative and quantitative methods,  Sachan & Datta (2005)’s general literature review, Christopher et al. (2006) taxonomy of SC strategies, Cox (1999): power.

Here’s the trend. Integration, CSR, risk management, even humanitarian logistics were already hot topics the last time we looked at them. Optimisation doesn’t make the list any more – though that can be due to the convenience sample of these very journals. The same goes for customisation and modularisation, and supply chain design. “Global” this and that has been dropped. Then again, what in supply chain management is local only?

Gyöngyi

→ 6 CommentsCategories: Academic journals · Academic publications · Supply Chain Management

Now: Nofoma 2009 back to basics

June 11, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The theme of the year is “innovation in logistics”, not entirely surprising at a university where logistics is under the department of entrepreneurship (JIBS’ EMM department). The probably most interesting paper under the theme was on logistics innovation at Mackay memorial hospital. But apart from this, the conference theme could (especially after last year’s “beyond business logistics”) very well be “back to basics”. With some notable exceptions (humanitarian logistics, CSR/sustainability issues) the tracks are most classic: purchasing, logistics strategy, logistics and IT, transport and distribution, logistics modelling and simulation… Is logistics research going back to basics?

Gyöngyi

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Conferences · Nofoma · Socks and sandals

SCM theory and practice – what comes first?

June 8, 2009 · 4 Comments

Can supply chain management work well in practice without drawing on ‘theories of supply chain management’?

Árni

→ 4 CommentsCategories: Scientific explanation · Socks and sandals · Supply Chain Management

Reading club

May 27, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Whether at the local library, online on facebook, or as a tv show, there are lots and lots of reading clubs. Tolkien belonged to one. Kids have their own. Academics have their own rules. Princeton even awarded Oprah an honorary doctorate in 2002, partly for her online reading club! Allegedly an idea at the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, reading clubs are arranged by students for students. Though I guess this one at the Oxford University Press website is not that particular Oxford Reading Club :-)

Gyöngyi

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Education & Management Development · Popular science · Socks and sandals

Questions of science, science and progress

April 15, 2009 · 5 Comments

Authors are well advised to check out editorial policies on review processes. While you may assume sending a paper to a international “peer reviewed” journal assures you of a blind review process, some even “better” journals (such as the International Journal of Production Economics) only subscribe to a single-blind review – i.e. authors do not know who their reviewers are but reviewers certainly do know who the authors are. This is not to say there wouldn’t be good arguments to present for single-blind or even open reviews, the question is just why this is not openly stated in the journal’s editorial policy… So this is not blind, it’s just candid. More room for ring-a-ring-o’-roses. Nobody said it was easy to be a scientist :-)

Gyöngyi

→ 5 CommentsCategories: Academic journals · Journal ranking · Operations management · Research & Methodology

Logistics dissertation awards once again

April 7, 2009 · 1 Comment

SOLE as well as LRN have just announced their deadlines for logistics dissertation awards: Apr 24 (forms/applications to Stanley Griffis) and May 22 (forms/applications to Sarah Skinns), respectively.

Gyöngyi

Edit on Apr 15: The 2009 Emerald/EFMD Outstanding Doctoral Research Awards are also up to grab, with the application deadline being Oct 1, 2009.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Logistics · Supply Chain Management

Must all inventories be “eliminated”?

March 11, 2009 · 3 Comments

I am a bit troubled with the representation of “lean” and “just-in-time” in various core textbooks. What students read far too often is that all inventories are waste and must be eliminated.

“First you identify the waste, then you elimiate it”.

Without recognising that inventories do have a role to play, and that role is easy to address e.g. through various trade-offs; inventory costs vs. other forms of logistics costs. And there is (ideally) also a relationship with customer service to consider.

The grumpy point I want to make is that the misinterpretation is not only the fault of the students; our textbooks can be (and are) vague on this point, and as teachers we must also pin this down more carefully.

Árni

→ 3 CommentsCategories: Socks and sandals · Supply Chain Management

Fake to impress

March 6, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Oddly enough, most Britons have lied about the books they’ve read in order to impress others; with a study revealing the “top ten list” of books people have lied about. The authors should be happy, even though they are not read, they are regarded as socially worth while reading. A lovely case of social desirability bias – sthg ethics scholars and corporate social responsibility researchers are quite familiar with. Apart from indirect questioning etc., one way to check for social desirability bias in a business setting is to see what a company does in an economic downturn – now it’s a good time for social desirability bias research, I reckon :-)

Gyöngyi

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Corporate Social Responsibility · Research & Methodology · Sustainability

JBL seeking editor

March 5, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The Journal of Business Logistics is seeking a new editor – see CSCMP’s call here. Deadline for applications: May 1, 2009

Gyöngyi

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Academic journals · Logistics · Research & Methodology · Supply Chain Management