Monthly Archives: May 2007

Humanitarian logistics summer school

The Università della Svizzera italiana is arranging its second summer school on humanitarian logistics in August 2007 (Aug 27-29) in wonderful Lugano. Applications can be sent in during June.

After that, in Sep 2007, the Centre of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (CeLS) at JIBS is about to arrange a HUMLOG workshop on the topic of “co-ordination in humanitarian logistics”. And later (Nov 2007) there is a symposium on humanitarian logistics arranged by Cranfield University and Cardiff University. NB! Abstracts for the CCHLI symposium are already due on June 18th, 2007!

Nice to see that the topic is catching interest!

Gyöngyi

Journal ranking updates

Gibson, Hanna and Menachof (this time together with Tony Whiteing) have updated their journal ranking for logistics and supply chain management journals – first results can be found here. And the top three are… as always. What is more interesting is the value of HBR and SCMReview for teaching and outreach purposes, and the combined rankings of journals.

More issues about the how to rank journals, how to publish (let’s hope not how to perish) are also forthcoming in Jan Stentoft Arlbjørn’s “ranking game” paper. (And we even know of yet another article under review on Nordic logistics journal rankings ;-) .)

Lots of new insights on SCM journal rankings are on the way!

Gyöngyi

What is hot and what is not II

A while ago, Árni asked the question whether a conference theme mattered. Well, does it? And do track themes matter? They might not get people into particular topics, but yes, set the scope of themes for a conference. And their reoccurrence is yet another indicator for “what is hot and what is not” in supply chain management research. Thus here’s a comparison of track themes (some held, some from the CFPs) across some SCM-relevant academic conferences in 2007 (CSCMP, CSCMP Europe, EUROMA, IPSERA, LRN, NOFOMA, POMS). And here are the winners:

1. Sustainability in the supply chain. Many conferences include reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains under this heading. What is new is a focus on labour issues in the global supply chain. 

2. Purchasing / global sourcing. This includes anything related to outsourcing. The dominance of the topic is evident as IPSERA was included in the topical “sample” (my bias).

3. Supply chain innovation. Now this is surprising. Innovations, new product developments, new technologies in the supply chain are on the rise as a topic.

4. – Supply chain collaboration, integration, and “alignment”. The latter being preferred by CSCMP Europe.
     - (Operations) planning and control, ops strategy.
     – ICT in the supply chain.
 Incl. special foci such as on RFID technology, e-supply chains and the such.

5. – Global supply chains / operations. Well, the topic might be too generic to attract that much attention, but “globalisation” is taken up in many other headings as well, such as:
     – Global transportation. Including third party logistics-related issues.
     – Risk management. And resilient supply chains, and managing disruptions.
     – Humanitarian logistics. My favourite :-) As a topic, even logistics in developing countries, and the implications of logistics FOR development hit the eye.
      – Warehousing / inventory management. And, as some conferences combined it, this category includes “physical distribution”. Old-fashioned, but prevailing.

6. – Performance management.
    - Leanness, agility and its variations.
    - Educational matters. Many conferences have educators’ days, but INFORMS even has a teaching-dedicated workshop. And check out POMS’ collection of ops mgmt (and indeed, SCM) course syllabi.

7. – Supply chain design and supply chain strategy.
    – Modelling, simulation and optimisation. In the supply chain, of course.
    – Production and manufacturing management. One could argue that entire POMS focuses on this topic, though.
    – Relationships, and supplier development.
    – New business models.

8. Ex aequo quality management, service operations management, project management, and interestingly, the latter including “event logistics”.

The rest of the topics are one-time appearances. One could of course group them according to some issues, such as industry-specific stuff (healthcare logistics is named in some variations), too generic issues as to be grouped (one track being called “supply chain management”, which reminds me of the “New Valley” tracks at Nofoma 2006 taking on anything ungroupable otherwise – and yes, the Norwegian School of Management had just moved to Nydalen, the “new valley”) etc. More interestingly, some “new topics” entered as well: knowledge management and finance logistics. Funny, these are the same ones as came up during the special issue ranking :-)

Gyöngyi

BTW, some deadlines are coming up soon, e.g. INFORMS‘ (extended) abstract submission deadline is June 1. (INFORMS is not included above due to not pre-defining track names – in vein of Nofoma 2007 not having a conference theme…)

On the intersection of marketing and SCM – a call for papers

Further to Gyöngyi’s entry on hot topics and CfP’s in SCM, here is a call for papers in JAMS on “Exploring the relationship between marketing and supply chain management”.

The words “multidisciplinary” and “fragmented adhocracy” (from Whitley, 1984) came into my mind. A further study on the latter you find here.

Árni

Pay As You Throw – A Chip In Your Bin?

A common way of charging residents for household waste is through a local tax on annual basis. The taxation is commonly based on the size of the actual property (ft. or m2) rather than the number of residents. In some cases, household pay for number of collections pr. month. By this aggregated approach it still remains unclear to what extent the revenue raised by this taxation covers the cost of collecting household waste to disposal.

Pay By Meter: Electricity, Gas, Water
Other serivces bougth by household include water, gas and electricity, all of which have been associated with the idea of sustainable development. The delivery and consumption of these services are measured, and household are expected to pay accordingly. Only companies that have been authorised are allowed to set up meters and inspect them on regular basis.

This is not the case for household waste. At least not yet.

Pay as you throw?
A lack of space for landfill, low rates of recycling and greenhouse gas emissions are few but many issues that inform the current discussion on household waste.

Fitting bins with microchips may be the solution, requiring household to pay as they throw. This is expected to “boost recycling” (see e.g. here on BBC, but this has been discussed for a while, see here and here at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), but has also fueled a debate on privacy concerns.

The question is whether recycling is a sufficient solution.

Finding a path to innovative solutions
Depending on what power consumers have, this may translate into demands for further efficiency in transport, packaging and storing at the up-stream levels of the supply chain. This was issued more than ten years ago by Prof. Marianne Jahre, at BI in Oslo, Norway, in a paper on Household waste collection as a reverse channel published in IJPDLM (1995, Vol. 25, No. 2), who proposed that the process of collection of waste for recycling may learn from concepts and approaches commonly used in forward logistics flow, for example postponement.

It will be interesting to see whether this constrain will result in any innovative solutions, and also what level of the supply chain will react upon this.

Árni

ps. A search for “pay as you throw” on Google resulted in 147.000 hits today.

What is hot and what is not – hot topics and current CFPs in supply chain management research

What are the “hot topics” in supply chain management research? There are zillions of ways to determine what is “in” versus “out”. Take a CFP, a special issue, and supply chain management – combining them (esp. looking at now actual CFPs with yet-to-come deadlines) gives a mix of hot topics in SCM research. Here’s the resulting hitlist (order by #CFPs / topic):

- Risk management and disaster management, or a combination of both, e.g. the CFP on “managing supply chain risks in disasters” for IJRAM, agility and risk” for IJASM, or even “risk issues” in general (see JOM; SCF:IJ and even the Journal of Marketing Channels) as well as “disruption management and robust planning” (COR), and information security (IJISP)

- Corporate social responsibility (in supply chains – SCM:IJ, and in SME supply chainsBusiness Ethics), ethics (Omega, Journal of Macro-Marketing) and sustainability-related issues (JCP‘s special issue to appear soon)

- Supply chain integration, e.g. in relation to e-commerce (IJECRM) and b2b-markets (POM) or related to a myriad of lovely buzzwords such as ”networked enterprises“,  “collaborative engineering/manufacturing“and “collaborative business processes

Streamlining, optimising and modelling the supply chain, e.g. using ”intelligent systems” (IJISTA) and other “enabling technologies” (IJVCM) , or flexibility in modelling (Omega)

- Customisation and modularisation, e.g. ”mass customisation” (POM) and interestingly, even the effects of modularisation on human resources (Human Relations)

- And various other issues: knowledge management in the supply chain (IJKMS)operations strategy (IJPE), industry-specific issues (e.g. on the construction industry  in SCM:IJ), interfaces with other disciplines (e.g. marketing – see POM, and finance – see MS, again reinforcing “supply chain risk management” as a hot topic)…

There are also some nice collections of CFPs for special issues, e.g. of globalEDGE and the Decision Sciences Institute as well as POMS - but who would have thought Inderscience even had a blog about CFPs?

Gyöngyi

Conference fresh(wo)men

After CSCMP Europe, the much-talked-about Nofoma conference is approaching! (and Euroma, and LRN, and CSCMP, and and and…). Having just witnessed a bunch of seriously horrendeous presentations (what ever happened to “address your audience” and even just the most simple presentation skills?) I was reminded of a good old paper giving advice to ”fresh” PhD students on “How to…” attend academic conferences and get the best out of it. Those of you recognising yourselves in the stories, don’t take it personally ;) , it’s for a good purpose! Anyway, here it is – academic conferences for dummies.

And if you are in need of more humour to spice up PhD fresh(wo)man life, check out Stanford’s PhD comics called “Piled Higher and Deeper“.

Gyöngyi

Mamma Mia! — How you listen, what you hear.

A remark on relationships and the origin of concepts.

After seeing the ABBA musical Mamma Mia! in London’s West End I’ve become a bit concerned about — or maybe interested in — the origin of the ideas that lead into our research. Related to this, what influences you when you are thinking, discussing, and writing research proposals, analysis and/or results? The tsunami catastrophe, earthquakes, hurricanes and even 9/11 have made a number of scholars interested in various form of supply chain risk and humanitarian logistics.

When listening to the songs in Mamma Mia!, many of which were on the hit lists in the mid and late 1970s and until the early 1980s, I realised that they do to a large extent relate to relationships. What I heard at the musical, however, was not necessarily a romantic relationship alone, but also…and here it comes…buyer-supplier relationships.

Chiquitita:
…tell me the truth
Im a shoulder you can cry on
our best friend, Im the one you must rely on

Some articles on business relationships refer to “trust” and “vocie strategies”.

I do, I do, I do, I do, I do:
So love me or leave me,
make your choice but believe me
I love you

(Re-)Negotiation.

Knowing Me, Knowing You:
Breaking up is never easy, I know but I have to go

Reducing the supplier base.

Money, money, money:
I work all night, I work all day, to pay the bills I have to pay
Aint it sad
And still there never seems to be a single penny left for me

Arms length vs. long-term buyer-supplier relationships. In particular, Dyer’s paper on Transaction Value came into my mind.

S.O.S.:
Where are those happy days, they seem so hard to find
I tried to reach for you, but you have closed your mind

Opportunism?

Take A Chance On Me:
If you change your mind, Im the first in line
Honey Im still free
Take a chance on me

Supplier selection or supplier reduction.

Mamma Mia:
Ive been cheated by you since I dont know when

Moral hazard and supply chain risk?

Super trouper
Super Trouper beams are gonna blind me
But I wont feel blue
Like I always do
cause somewhere in the crowd theres you

Screening the supplier market – and element of both Krajlic’s portfolio model and Ellram’s discussion of Total Cost of Ownership.

Influence or not, the remaining issue is that phrases like collaboration, partnerships, close integration, supply chains, networks and relationships are too often used without further relfection, and may as such, easily become dogmatic, especially since it is difficult if not possible to trace the origins of these concepts.

These are the thoughts generated during the musical. Here are the questions that did emerge after the show:

1. Did the ABBA songs have an influence on the early publications of networks, inter-firm interaction, and buyer-supplier relationships that have emerged since the mid 1970s?

2. If there is some correlation to be found in question 1, the more important question is: What music may you be listening to when thinking about your research topics or writing your papers?

A sub-component of the latter question is whether the rigor of the research methods manages to neturalise this potential influence. But at the end of the day, is research truly objective, conducted without any personal emotions and influence of good music?

Árni

Organization Theory and Supply Chain Management

Here you find an introductory paper to a special issue on Organization Theory and Supply Chain Management that was recently published in Journal of Operations Management (edited by David J. Ketchen Jr. and Tomas M. Hult).

They state that “…to date, researchers interested in operations management in general and in supply chain management (SCM) in particular have made limited use of organizational theories”. Here is the full abstract:

Organization theory (OT) has the potential to offer provocative and helpful wisdom to the field of supply chain management, yet OT’s potential has remained largely underdeveloped in the supply chain arena. As a result, enormous opportunities exist to integrate insights from organization theory and supply chain management in order to build understanding of why some supply chains excel while others do not. We preview the contributions toward developing such a synthesis offered by each of the articles contained in this special issue. Collectively, the articles take a significant step toward closing the gap between ‘what we know’ and ‘what we need to know’ about supply chain management.

It would be interesting to reverse this and ask what Organization Theory may learn from SCM?! The challenge of that discussion is the difficulty of explaining what “chain” is all about, and more specifically, to what extent “chains” do constitute an object of study (for researchers) or a managerial domain (business managers).

Edited: It should be added that James Stock made this call more than ten years ago in this paper , who identifies a number of areas of study that the field of logistics can benefit borrowing theories from.

Árni

New tricks for old dogs

After 3G SCM here’s 3L: life-long learning, including the “university of the 3rd age” or U3A. The call is for continuous education, “adult” education (as if university students weren’t adults), practitioner courses, executive MBAs etc. Yes, it is highly depressing to see studies on how quickly students forget something, as pointed out by Bacon and Stewart (2006) for the topic of consumer behaviour. Now the EU even has a call for life-long learning programmes – is there anyone out there doing sthg in logistics/SCM for that? One of the issues in the call is the establishment of research and education centres (such as e.g. CeLS in Jönköping).

So, we live and learn. (Interestingly, this includes the need for “unschooling“.) But seriously, what can educators do for “old dogs”? And aren’t educators old dogs themselves who need to “unlearn” patterns?

Luckily SCM educators do have platforms to exchange ideas, educators conferences and groups (SCMEC at CSCMP, Nofoma educators’ day), educators newsletters (such as THE ed-LINK), common initiatives to develop teaching materials (such as the Nordic Case Reader in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – this one being generally interesting due to the global competitiveness of the Nordic countries) etc. However, little is published on SCM education in academic journals (with the notable exception of a special issue in the International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management back in 2001). So where do we get our new tricks from? YouTube has some videos for us (their number in Árni’s SCM index is growing constantly), newsletters offer webinars, but also, there are blogs that are dedicated to explaining and teaching SCM-related issues! Remodel’s blog on health care manufacturing offers sweet graphs and case studies, and SupplyChainNetwork.com even has a tag dedicated to education (as do we). And one of my favourites is John Ramsay’s website dedicated to both SCM educators and students. Old and young dogs, it’s time to learn new tricks!

Gyöngyi