Monthly Archives: October 2008

Watering down the supply chain

Green SCM has been around for quite some time, it’s just sad it needs the extra political push to make it the headlines. In any case, carbon emissions have in the past year or so become a really “hot topic” even in the supply chain. Now the topic is being watered down. No, don’t get me wrong, it is not losing in relevance. Just, the next big thing is the topic of water itself.

The part of it that makes the headlines is the question of bottled water. It is almost comical that the sales of bottled water is on the rise even in countries such as Finland while recent water quality assessments point out that Finnish tap water is “better” than any bottled water on the market… It seems that companies selling bottled water knew this all along, having only as late as 2007 been forced to spell out the lovely acronym of PWC on its bottles, which meant nothing else than “public water source“.

Just think of the carbon footprint of shipping water around! Water not exactly being a “light” product, it is no wonder that humanitarian aid projects rather provide water purification tablets than actual water wherever this is an option – also, to meet the UN’s Millenium Development Goals related to water & sanitation. Talking about the carbon footprint, shouldn’t we start looking into the water footprint of supply chains soon?

Gyöngyi

Assembly line the origin of causal explanation in logistics? Must we reject “supply chain” as metaphor?

Few thoughts about the dominant position of causal explanations in logistics (and supply chain management) research.

Do causal explanations have their origin in the chain metaphor?

What is the origin of the supply chain metaphor? We probably don’t know.

Ramsay and Caldwell (2004:81)* suggest that the origins of the supply chain as metaphor is by no means clear and that “…any appearance of clarity and stability is imaginary”. The origins are lost, but conceptually, it may refer to human bucket chain (buckets of water moving along from hand to hand to put out fire) becoming a literal reference to a process.

To this observation I want to add Henry Ford’s assembly line – it has been a key reference in textbooks and journals. What is of interest for me is to consider how the ideas of sequence and the quest for regularity and stability as basis for efficient and effective flow (of materials…). Have these traits, that can be associated with the assembly line, had influence on the methodologies of research within logistics (and perhaps also related disciplines such as operations management)?

Is the quest for stability of the assembly line informing the quest for law like regularity as explanation in logistics research?

If that is the case, will we ever be able to address other types of scientific explanation but the causal one in logistics without disregarding (or perhaps rejecting) the “supply chain” as metaphor?

Árni

*Ramsay, John and Caldwell, Nigel (2004): If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail: the risks of casual trope usage in purchasing discourse, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 10 (2004) 79–87.

A virtual academic conference

Companies have embraced e-conferencing for a long time, now finally also academic conferences have moved into that direction. So  here it comes, the virtual academic conference. Not surprisingly, the first academic community to embrace it is information and systems sciences. It’s actually a long (8 days) conference, with lots of the “old” technology such as powerpoint presentations, and some new such as tuning in globally at different times.

We had called for such a conference earlier from the perspective of making conferences more sustainable, i.e. eliminating transportation emissions as well as travel times and costs. However, it remains to be seen how a virtual conference impacts on the academic community – conferences are not only there for the sole presentation purpose, after all.

Gyöngyi

The ethnocentricity of logistics journals

Where does all the talk about a “US-focus” of logistics journals come from? Göran Svensson, Terje Slåtten and Bård Tronvoll investigated this question (even if not posing it this explicitly) when assessing the “scientific identity” and “ethnocentricity” of logistics journals. Not surprisingly, the composition of editorial teams and editorial boards had an impact on where the articles of a journal came from. (e.g. JBL’s editorial team, board as well as reviewers almost exclusively being based in the US.) Perhaps a bit more surprisingly, there are vast geographical areas (in fact continents) that are neglected in all top logistics journals: South America, Africa, Asia, and to some extent also Australia. Not only is this bad for logistics research, but it compares really badly to e.g. marketing. Although it may stem from what is perceived as “logistics research” in different areas – as noted in an earlier post on logistics education, it is quite telling which departments logistics is housed in globally, e.g. under finance in China, marketing OR management science in Europe and the US etc. (see Yen-Chun Jim Wu‘s 2007 article comparing logistics education schemes).

In any case, Svensson et al.’s article is a wake-up call for logistics journals (and their editors) as much as for logistics researchers from under-represented geographical areas to publish articles from different regions as well. Some special issues in this direction might help…

Gyöngyi

Calls for humanitarian logistics research

Good news for researchers in humanitarian logistics, there are more and more conferences setting up specific tracks, and a number of special issues calling for papers on humanitarian logistics, humanitarian supply chains, humanitarian operations… Here’s a bit of a selection:

Apart from POMS’ humanitarian group and INFORMS’ humanitarian track, now also the Transportation Research Forum (TRF) agreed to have a track on humanitarian logistics. (Abstract deadline Oct 31, 2008; contact Paul Larson). A track on “Humanitarian actions and operations” has also been included to the International Conference on Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM) conference. (Paper deadline Jan 11, 2009, contact Alexander Blecken.) Last but not least, both NOFOMA 2009 (Jönköping) and LRN 2009 (Cardiff) have humanitarian logistics tracks! (no wonder, both are arranged by HUMLOG Group members ;-) )

Now to some interesting CFPs for special issues of different journals:
- Production and Operations Management calls for papers on “POM research on emerging markets“. Deadline Dec 1, 2008
- Interfaces calls for papers on “Humanitarian applications: doing good with good OR“. Deadline May 15, 2009

Updates can always be found on our wall :-)

Gyöngyi

PS. Note the NOFOMA website having changed to http://www.nofoma.net
PPS. More for humanitarian logisticians, the HUMLOG Group has a self-subscription newsletter (check out the instructions on their website) that is administered by the HUMLOG Institute.