Monthly Archives: March 2009

Must all inventories be “eliminated”?

I am a bit troubled with the representation of “lean” and “just-in-time” in various core textbooks. What students read far too often is that all inventories are waste and must be eliminated.

“First you identify the waste, then you elimiate it”.

Without recognising that inventories do have a role to play, and that role is easy to address e.g. through various trade-offs; inventory costs vs. other forms of logistics costs. And there is (ideally) also a relationship with customer service to consider.

The grumpy point I want to make is that the misinterpretation is not only the fault of the students; our textbooks can be (and are) vague on this point, and as teachers we must also pin this down more carefully.

Árni

Fake to impress

Oddly enough, most Britons have lied about the books they’ve read in order to impress others; with a study revealing the “top ten list” of books people have lied about. The authors should be happy, even though they are not read, they are regarded as socially worth while reading. A lovely case of social desirability bias – sthg ethics scholars and corporate social responsibility researchers are quite familiar with. Apart from indirect questioning etc., one way to check for social desirability bias in a business setting is to see what a company does in an economic downturn – now it’s a good time for social desirability bias research, I reckon :-)

Gyöngyi

JBL seeking editor

The Journal of Business Logistics is seeking a new editor – see CSCMP’s call here. Deadline for applications: May 1, 2009

Gyöngyi

Conference woes

Remember the times when academics met at conferences to discuss the newest results of their research, find collaboration partners, or even just to mingle? It seems these times are over. The latest trend at universities (blame it on the credit crunch, if you like) is to not support conference attendance any more. There is just one catch: presenting a paper at a conference is a first step towards a journal publication, especially if you get good feedback at the conference. And another: you won’t really know much about potential collaboration partners without ever meeting them. It’s not as if “upcoming” projects would ever be found on a website or in journal publications…

There is another problem with the “first step towards a publication” notion: some conference explicitly see their proceedings as publications and do not allow you to send them further to a journal (not even if you really worked on them later).

Will this be the end to academics going to conferences?

Gyöngyi

SCM journal rankings, here we go again

Finally, it’s out, the Menachof/Gibson/Hanna/Whiteing update on SCM journal rankings. Some of their findings will be interesting to read to the researchers who just sent out a survey on the ranking of transportation journals :-) Other findings confirm previous studies, with the trio of JBL, IJPDLM and IJLM being on top for research, and with a number of reviews (i.e. more practitioner-oriented journals) leading the teaching bit. A convergence of the three amigos is also to be seen, with OM journals “entering” the list. Does it mean we agree on SCM even though we come from different backgrounds?

Gyöngyi