Interorganisational – Supply Chain Management

Entries categorized as ‘Academic journals’

Now: Euroma 2009

June 17, 2009 · Leave a Comment

“Meet the editors” at Euroma: JOM and (the new) IJOPM editors declared in unison that they were most interested in theory-driven, empirically based papers. In other words, nothing that does not take its parameters at least from an actual empirical study, and nothing that just suggest yet another (consultancy) ‘methodology’. Well, IJOPM did add their quest for more conceptual pieces that would challenge existing frameworks. But while these two are trying to move up in academic quality, rigor, and citation indices, another journal has been introduced with the aim of being a solid “B” journal: OM Review. Though as Andi Smart pointed out, not as if IJOPM had ever rejected a paper with the suggestion to submit it to JOM instead :-)

What else was new? Euroma 2009 had a number of special tracks, but the most overwhelming in number of papers was the one on ops mgmt in healthcare. It ran through the entire conference and even had parallel healthcare sessions.

Gyöngyi

PS Please post the link to OM Review if you find it – I haven’t come across any direct link, just many references to the journal.

Categories: Academic journals · Conferences · Journal ranking · Operations management

Trendspotting: what is hot and what is not

June 14, 2009 · 6 Comments

Trendspotting is a lovely sport. In research you can look at conference tracks, topics of current calls for papers, conduct your own survey on trends, or have a glance on which articles are downloaded the most. Downloads are interesting as they reveal not only what is read but implicitly, which topics academics currently work on. Let’s see the (convenience sample of) Emerald statistics for IJLM, IJPDLM and SCM:IJ. So here’s the what is hot in terms of being most downloaded in the first quarter of 2009 (compared to previous such lists from 2008). “Hotties” are the articles that are new or got into the spotlight in 2009, “classics” are the ones that were already in the spotlight in 2008 and continue to be there.

1. Supply chain integration (and collaboration). An outstanding paper award just went to such a topic, to Fabbe-Costes and Jahre (2008) article on SC integration (congrats!). Another outstanding hottie is Pålsson & Johansson’s (2009) SC integration through labelling that received most downloads ever within the first 6 months after publication (and has only been published in 2009, no 6 months have gone yet). Many of the classics look at characteristics of SCM and the supply chain management framework, such as Croxton et al.’s (2001) SC processes (framework), Cooper et al. (1997): SCM framework, Cooper & Ellram (1993): characteristics of SCM, Power (2005): SC integration, Fawcett et al. (2008): SC integration, New (1997) scope of SCM and collaboration such as Barratt’s (2004) SC collaboration andSandberg’s (2007) logistics collaboration.

2. Corporate social responsibility, ethics, and green/reverse supply chains (indeed moving towards more CSR and ethics focus). With hotties such as Hanafi et al. (2008) as well as van Hoek (1999) on reverse logistics, Wikner & Tang (2008) on closed-loop SC, and Andersen & Skjoett-Larsen (2009) moving towards CSR, and Svensson & Bååth (2008) towards SC ethics. The classics here are Carter & Rogers’ (2008) framework for sustainable SCM, Wu & Dunn (1995) environmentally responsible logistics, and Markley & Davis’ (1997) sustainable SCM.

3. Supply chain risk management. The hotties (new interest) are articles such as Christopher & Lee (2004) on SC risk mitigation, Khan et al. (2008) product design and SC risk, Khan & Burnes (2007) on SC risk. In addition there are a number of steady interest articles (the “classics”) on this topic such as Norrman & Jansson (2004): SC risk management at Ericsson, Manuj & Mentzer (2008) and Jüttner (2005) and Finch (2004) on SC risk management in general.

4. Lean and agile supply chains. Agility is in fashio, or at least in the fashion industry, says Masson et al. (2007). Another hottie is Christopher & Towill’s (2001) article on agility. Classics are Jones et al.’s (1997) lean logistics, and Christopher & Towill (2000) lean and agile supply chains.

5. E-commerce. Hotties such as Cho et al.’s (2008) logistics capability in e-commerce, Giménez & Lourenço (2008): e-commerce, classics: Puschmann & Alt (2005) e-procurement, Lewis et al. (2005): internet.

6. RFID. Pålsson & Johansson’s (2009) article also falls into this category. Classics are Spekman & Sweeney (2007),  Attaran (2007) and Vijayaraman & Osyk (2006).

Other topics with more interest:
(a) Value chain analysis. Hotties: Barber (2008),  Classics: Taylor (2005)
(b) Humanitarian logistics. Hotties: Kovács and Spens (2007),  Oloruntoba & Gray (2006). No classics (i.e. a very “hot topic”).
(c) Demand management. Hotties: Walters (2008). Classics: Walters (2006). (a one-man show?)
(d) Logistics outsourcing. Classics: Razzaque & Sheng (1998), Kremic et al. (2006). No hotties, though (i.e. no newcomers, no renewed interest articles).
(e) Warehousing and inventory management. Hotties: Williams & Tokar’s (2008) inventory management, Claassen et al. (2008) VMI. Classics: Nynke Faber et al. (2002) warehouse complexity, Baker (2007) inventory mgmt
(f) Transportation. Hotties: Meixell & Norbis (2008): transport mode selection, Mangan et al. (2008): port-centric logistics. Classics: Selviaridis & Spring (2007): TPL
(g) Implementation of SCM. Classics: Sridharan et al. (2005) SC implementation, Wong et al. (2005) SC toy practice. Interestingly, no hotties.

Other hotties on random topics. Notably, these are unique articles that triggered a lot of interest among readers. These are Fernie & Grant’s (2008) on-shelf availability, Shook et al.’s (2009): strategic sourcing (another breakthrough article looking at downloads of the first 6 months), and Green et al.’s (2008) logistics performance.

Other classics. Mangan et al. (2004): qualitative and quantitative methods,  Sachan & Datta (2005)’s general literature review, Christopher et al. (2006) taxonomy of SC strategies, Cox (1999): power.

Here’s the trend. Integration, CSR, risk management, even humanitarian logistics were already hot topics the last time we looked at them. Optimisation doesn’t make the list any more – though that can be due to the convenience sample of these very journals. The same goes for customisation and modularisation, and supply chain design. “Global” this and that has been dropped. Then again, what in supply chain management is local only?

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Academic publications · Supply Chain Management

Questions of science, science and progress

April 15, 2009 · 5 Comments

Authors are well advised to check out editorial policies on review processes. While you may assume sending a paper to a international “peer reviewed” journal assures you of a blind review process, some even “better” journals (such as the International Journal of Production Economics) only subscribe to a single-blind review – i.e. authors do not know who their reviewers are but reviewers certainly do know who the authors are. This is not to say there wouldn’t be good arguments to present for single-blind or even open reviews, the question is just why this is not openly stated in the journal’s editorial policy… So this is not blind, it’s just candid. More room for ring-a-ring-o’-roses. Nobody said it was easy to be a scientist :-)

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Journal ranking · Operations management · Research & Methodology

JBL seeking editor

March 5, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The Journal of Business Logistics is seeking a new editor – see CSCMP’s call here. Deadline for applications: May 1, 2009

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Logistics · Research & Methodology · Supply Chain Management

SCM journal rankings, here we go again

March 2, 2009 · 1 Comment

Finally, it’s out, the Menachof/Gibson/Hanna/Whiteing update on SCM journal rankings. Some of their findings will be interesting to read to the researchers who just sent out a survey on the ranking of transportation journals :-) Other findings confirm previous studies, with the trio of JBL, IJPDLM and IJLM being on top for research, and with a number of reviews (i.e. more practitioner-oriented journals) leading the teaching bit. A convergence of the three amigos is also to be seen, with OM journals “entering” the list. Does it mean we agree on SCM even though we come from different backgrounds?

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Journal ranking · Supply Chain Management

The academic bubble

February 25, 2009 · 2 Comments

Ring a ring o’ roses… This is actually the title of a fascinating article on how to play the game of getting published, getting cited, publishing in “quality” journals etc. It is enlightening how little the quality of an article actually matters, and how we prefer where an article has been published over what it actually contains.

As for journal rankings, it’s a vicious circle of them being based on “quality” people publishing in a journal who submit their paper to the journal only because its a “quality” journal. And another vicious circle of journal ranking being based on (self?)-citations and on the inclusion of both the cited and citing journal article in the SSCI (otherwise your citation is just not counted). Then there is also the self-fulfilling prophecy of higher journal rankings leading to more submissions leading to higher rejection rates and an even higher journal ranking…

Just when is this academic bubble going to burst? The authors (Stuart Macdonald and Jacqueline Kam) suggest a game of tinkerbell to deal with it… and have been quite successful in the gamesmanship they criticise – this very article got them high publication points.

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Journal ranking · Research & Methodology

Two more CFPs in humanitarian logistics

February 9, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Some special issues are already about to come out, but here are two more CFPs related to humanitarian logistics:

- Supply Chain Forum calling for papers on “Humanitarian supply chains” (editors Ian Heigh and Marianne Jahre, deadline May 1, 2009)

- The International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management calling for papers on “Developments in humanitarian logistics” (editors Peter Tatham and Stephen Pettit, deadline Oct 30, 2009)

Not to forget a CFP that has been in circulation for some time now, on “Doing good with good OR” for Interfaces (DL May 15, 2009) and numerous conferences and conference tracks calling for papers on humanitarian logistics…

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Call for papers · Humanitarian supply chains

Open source review

January 26, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Remember when Árni suggested to debate articles in public, as a sort of open source review? The Journal of Operations Management has indeed taken on the idea and publishes articles, and ideas for articles, in their operations and supply management forum. Some of the articles did already generate quite a number of (high quality) comments. Today’s topic is “too much theory, not enough understanding”. Time to log on and contribute to the debate!

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Academic publications · Operations management · Popular science · Research & Methodology · Supply Chain Management · Theory

Publish or perish – getting promoted (or not) in academia

January 22, 2009 · 1 Comment

It seems that academia has followed the “publish or perish” mantra since time immemorial. (Which reminds me, there is even a programme called “Publish or Perish” that analyses academic citations via Google Scholar).

But just how do publications in academic journals (and the quality of these journals vs. number of publications) relate to getting promoted in academia? AMA has just opened a discussion group around a recent article in the Journal of Marketing that revisits this question. In this article, Seggie and Griffith (2009) draw a link not only between publications and promotion in academia (which in logistics has been established in a number of Vellenga et al. papers) but also between publications in “good” journals (i.e. journal rankings) and promotions at/to “good” universities (i.e. university rankings). As for the marketing discipline, it appears that scholars from highly ranked academic institutions publish more in the top marketing journals.

My question would be whether this finding could be replicated in SCM. One of the problems here is the persistence of functional silos in academia. We have rankings in logistics, purchasing, operations management, … (you name it) but as Kovács, Spens and Vellenga (2008) found, these “academic tribes” differ substantially in their views on journal rankings. What is more, which are the “top academic institutions” in our discipline…?

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Journal ranking · Supply Chain Management

Suffering from deadlinitis

January 9, 2009 · 1 Comment

Too many deadlines? Yes, that’s what January is all about, it’s a peak of deadlines for SCM-related conferences and special issues in journals – not to speak of the journal special issues that are linked to conferences.

- The Humanitarian Logistic Symposium of CCHLI is linked to a (yet to be announced) special issue of IJPDLM (yep, the deadline was on Jan 5),
- CSCMP Europe to a special issue of JBL (deadline today, Jan 9),
- NOFOMA to IJPDLM (deadline Jan 12)
- POMS to POM (deadline Jan 15)
- EUROMA to IJOPM (deadline Jan 16)…

… and that’s only the conferences with a deadline in January. Plus there are conferences that also have a deadline in January but are not all that visibly linked to journals. And special issues that are not related to conferences. Phew!

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Call for papers · Conferences · Logistics · Nofoma · Operations management · Supply Chain Management