Interorganisational – Supply Chain Management

Entries categorized as ‘Academic publications’

Trendspotting: what is hot and what is not

June 14, 2009 · 6 Comments

Trendspotting is a lovely sport. In research you can look at conference tracks, topics of current calls for papers, conduct your own survey on trends, or have a glance on which articles are downloaded the most. Downloads are interesting as they reveal not only what is read but implicitly, which topics academics currently work on. Let’s see the (convenience sample of) Emerald statistics for IJLM, IJPDLM and SCM:IJ. So here’s the what is hot in terms of being most downloaded in the first quarter of 2009 (compared to previous such lists from 2008). “Hotties” are the articles that are new or got into the spotlight in 2009, “classics” are the ones that were already in the spotlight in 2008 and continue to be there.

1. Supply chain integration (and collaboration). An outstanding paper award just went to such a topic, to Fabbe-Costes and Jahre (2008) article on SC integration (congrats!). Another outstanding hottie is Pålsson & Johansson’s (2009) SC integration through labelling that received most downloads ever within the first 6 months after publication (and has only been published in 2009, no 6 months have gone yet). Many of the classics look at characteristics of SCM and the supply chain management framework, such as Croxton et al.’s (2001) SC processes (framework), Cooper et al. (1997): SCM framework, Cooper & Ellram (1993): characteristics of SCM, Power (2005): SC integration, Fawcett et al. (2008): SC integration, New (1997) scope of SCM and collaboration such as Barratt’s (2004) SC collaboration andSandberg’s (2007) logistics collaboration.

2. Corporate social responsibility, ethics, and green/reverse supply chains (indeed moving towards more CSR and ethics focus). With hotties such as Hanafi et al. (2008) as well as van Hoek (1999) on reverse logistics, Wikner & Tang (2008) on closed-loop SC, and Andersen & Skjoett-Larsen (2009) moving towards CSR, and Svensson & Bååth (2008) towards SC ethics. The classics here are Carter & Rogers’ (2008) framework for sustainable SCM, Wu & Dunn (1995) environmentally responsible logistics, and Markley & Davis’ (1997) sustainable SCM.

3. Supply chain risk management. The hotties (new interest) are articles such as Christopher & Lee (2004) on SC risk mitigation, Khan et al. (2008) product design and SC risk, Khan & Burnes (2007) on SC risk. In addition there are a number of steady interest articles (the “classics”) on this topic such as Norrman & Jansson (2004): SC risk management at Ericsson, Manuj & Mentzer (2008) and Jüttner (2005) and Finch (2004) on SC risk management in general.

4. Lean and agile supply chains. Agility is in fashio, or at least in the fashion industry, says Masson et al. (2007). Another hottie is Christopher & Towill’s (2001) article on agility. Classics are Jones et al.’s (1997) lean logistics, and Christopher & Towill (2000) lean and agile supply chains.

5. E-commerce. Hotties such as Cho et al.’s (2008) logistics capability in e-commerce, Giménez & Lourenço (2008): e-commerce, classics: Puschmann & Alt (2005) e-procurement, Lewis et al. (2005): internet.

6. RFID. Pålsson & Johansson’s (2009) article also falls into this category. Classics are Spekman & Sweeney (2007),  Attaran (2007) and Vijayaraman & Osyk (2006).

Other topics with more interest:
(a) Value chain analysis. Hotties: Barber (2008),  Classics: Taylor (2005)
(b) Humanitarian logistics. Hotties: Kovács and Spens (2007),  Oloruntoba & Gray (2006). No classics (i.e. a very “hot topic”).
(c) Demand management. Hotties: Walters (2008). Classics: Walters (2006). (a one-man show?)
(d) Logistics outsourcing. Classics: Razzaque & Sheng (1998), Kremic et al. (2006). No hotties, though (i.e. no newcomers, no renewed interest articles).
(e) Warehousing and inventory management. Hotties: Williams & Tokar’s (2008) inventory management, Claassen et al. (2008) VMI. Classics: Nynke Faber et al. (2002) warehouse complexity, Baker (2007) inventory mgmt
(f) Transportation. Hotties: Meixell & Norbis (2008): transport mode selection, Mangan et al. (2008): port-centric logistics. Classics: Selviaridis & Spring (2007): TPL
(g) Implementation of SCM. Classics: Sridharan et al. (2005) SC implementation, Wong et al. (2005) SC toy practice. Interestingly, no hotties.

Other hotties on random topics. Notably, these are unique articles that triggered a lot of interest among readers. These are Fernie & Grant’s (2008) on-shelf availability, Shook et al.’s (2009): strategic sourcing (another breakthrough article looking at downloads of the first 6 months), and Green et al.’s (2008) logistics performance.

Other classics. Mangan et al. (2004): qualitative and quantitative methods,  Sachan & Datta (2005)’s general literature review, Christopher et al. (2006) taxonomy of SC strategies, Cox (1999): power.

Here’s the trend. Integration, CSR, risk management, even humanitarian logistics were already hot topics the last time we looked at them. Optimisation doesn’t make the list any more – though that can be due to the convenience sample of these very journals. The same goes for customisation and modularisation, and supply chain design. “Global” this and that has been dropped. Then again, what in supply chain management is local only?

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Academic publications · Supply Chain Management

Academic publishing workshop

February 27, 2009 · 1 Comment

To be a bit more positive about academic publishing, LIHE is planning a workshop on “Writing for journal publication” in Sep in Greece. Check it out.

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic publications · Research & Methodology

Securing cargo

February 23, 2009 · 1 Comment

Security seems to be the next big topic in supply chain management research. Or rather, a range of topics, from intellectual property rights (read counterfeit) to health and safety questions (read unwanted additives like led in toys, melamine in milk…), to technology to increase flow visibility (read RFID to locate your goods), piracy and theft. Even the EU’s 7th Framework Programme has a security focus, prompting an own Wikipedia entry on supply chain security. Yet apart from projects on biosecurity, the interest in SCM research has not been overwhelming. Articles on the topic are particularly rare. So this is to welcome one of a kind, Daniel Ekwall’s article on “the displacement effect of cargo theft“. The sad news is that theft patterns just change over time…

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic publications · Supply Chain Management

Open source review

January 26, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Remember when Árni suggested to debate articles in public, as a sort of open source review? The Journal of Operations Management has indeed taken on the idea and publishes articles, and ideas for articles, in their operations and supply management forum. Some of the articles did already generate quite a number of (high quality) comments. Today’s topic is “too much theory, not enough understanding”. Time to log on and contribute to the debate!

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Academic publications · Operations management · Popular science · Research & Methodology · Supply Chain Management · Theory

How to… write an abstract

January 22, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Here comes the first hurdle to an academic contribution (journal article, conference paper): the abstract. Varying in length and structure, it is the teaser one has to write to water the mouth of the reader. There are lots of good guides to abstract writing (see e.g. Emerald’s collection of “how to guides“); here is also a “fill in the blanks” version :-)

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic publications · Socks and sandals

The watchdog – recent publications in humanitarian logistics

January 2, 2009 · Leave a Comment

There are many who claim to be first, having written an entire “book” on humanitarian logistics. If you search for it on Amazon, you’d find that there are a few in the publishing process, e.g. Tomasini & van Wassenhove’s long-awaited overview (that should finally be commercially available in Apr 2009). Just in December 2008, two doctoral dissertations were published in humanitarian logistics: by  Ramina Samii and Sabine Schulz. Ramina’s thesis presents a number of case studies and a typology of partnerships of humanitarian organisations, while Sabine’s thesis looks at the concept of co-operation from the perspective of performance measurement. Whether first or not, they are definitely worth the reading.

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic publications · Book review · Humanitarian supply chains

Rigor AND relevance

September 8, 2008 · Leave a Comment

The very same number of the Journal of Supply Chain Management publishing Oliver E. Williamson’s SCM-related article was dedicated to the debate of bridging the gap between research and practice. Funnily, it had articles on both rigor vs. relevance (or, a rather serious debate on headlinitis in SCM research), as well as Tom (John T) Mentzer questioning whether researchers would indeed need to choose between the two. True, why wouldn’t we strive for BOTH rigor and relevance? Finally a fruitful debate in the discipline!

Funny is also the application of SCM thinking to the discipline itself. So the very same article presents a process model of SC scholarship. A bit in the vein of the old IJPDLM article on the supply chain of publishing (or rather, the “supply circle” of publishing) that reflects on the suppliers (authors), customers (=audience = authors and potential authors) and operational entities (=reviewers & editors = authors and former authors) of academic publishing. Rigor might be attested in this process, but what about relevance (vs. headlinitis)?

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic publications · Research & Methodology · Supply Chain Management

New book: Logistics and Supply Chain Management

April 29, 2008 · 2 Comments

After receiving it twice within a week, it’s time to have a look at Patrik Jonsson’s new textbook on, as it says, Logistics and Supply Chain Management. As a completely new book it has the advantage of working in SCM thoroughly through all of it – as opposed to 7th editions of other books… Patrik managed to avoid the logistics functions trap, i.e. has chapters on “the material flow” instead of treating each function separately. Well done. Most of the mini-cases in the book are European ones (including many Nordic ones, for all of those who talk about “going to Europe” when crossing the Baltic Sea or the North Sea ;-) ), not surprisingly, McGraw-Hill also positioned the book for the European market.

Gyöngyi

PS. A pity it’s written in English, though – I’m hunting for a good book in Swedish for our basic course…

Categories: Academic publications · Book review · Education & Management Development · Logistics · Supply Chain Management

SCM journal impact factors

April 22, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Journal rankings are always sensitive questions; no wonder our posts on rankings are among the most viewed ones (here’s the last one). Rankings of SCM journals also exist in abundance, based on surveys among scholars in the field, or on citation indices. As for the latter, many universities have gone over to follow the Thomson ISI ratings to evaluate the publications of their faculty. But while several journals are now in fact in the process of getting an ISI rating, an awful lot of SCM journals have not received one yet. In the meantime, here are some (alternative) citation indices to look at. The “H-index” has been developed as an alternative, even Google Scholar has come out with it’s own calculations. The International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Journal of Business Logistics, and the Journal of Supply Chain Management get quite impressive ratings in Harzing and van der Wal’s (2007) report.

Another interesting ranking is the SCImago journal and country rank. While SCM journals figure just under the mixed “business” category, it’s fun to look at the country ranks.

All these rankings and ratings boil down to one question: is ISI really just the only one universities should look at? And which consequences does such a decision bear for SCM scholars? Yet, having discussed this at several conferences already, the answer from publishing houses is that it’s up to scholars to promote their journals to be included in the ISI. If enough people recommend a journal to be included in the evaluation, Thomson ISI will take it in. So, let’s start the process of getting our journals in and recommend them!

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic journals · Academic publications · Journal ranking · Supply Chain Management

Dissertation awards

April 15, 2008 · 5 Comments

There are lots of awards for supply chain excellence for corporations – as well as for research. As for the latter, the University of Arkansas just announced its 2008 SCMRC doctoral dissertation award. Dissertation proposals of 15 pages (plus CVs of the applicant and her/his supervisor, and a letter of application) should be submitted by Aug 31 ( 2008 ) to Jim Crowell who also answers questions about the award.

However, there are other awards as well, practically every SCM-related professional organisation has its own award. Some are for dissertation proposals, but more commonly, awards are given for people who have recently finished their doctorate (PhD / DBA / DSc). Mind you, most awards have some regional restrictions; LOGY in Finland only giving awards for people who finished their PhD at a Finnish university etc. Still, here are some to watch out for or to inspire as to where one could find similar awards “at home”:

- One of the awards for young PhDs (anyone who defended their doctoral thesis in logistics / SCM since Jun 1, 2007) is CILT UK’s dissertation award for which applications are due on May 16.

- CSCMP’s dissertation award is usually open for applications by the end of February (past for 2008, but doctoral students should keep this in mind for 2009). Again, this is for young PhDs.

And, apart from these, there are always best paper awards at conferences (LRN, Nofoma, POMS… you name it). Nofoma even gives a special best paper award to doctoral students – BUT, only those qualify who wrote a paper alone and/or with other doctoral students. This is to ensure that it’s not the supervisor’s work ;-)

Gyöngyi

Categories: Academic publications · Education & Management Development · Research & Methodology · Supply Chain Management