<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Interorganisational -- supply chain management &#187; Research &#38; Methodology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://interorganisational.org/category/research-methodology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://interorganisational.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:02:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='interorganisational.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://interorganisational.org/osd.xml" title="Interorganisational &#8212; supply chain management" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://interorganisational.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>BDOM archives or another way to facilitate research</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2010/01/18/bdom-archives-or-another-way-to-facilitate-research/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2010/01/18/bdom-archives-or-another-way-to-facilitate-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operations management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few groups see the benefit of social networks for research as clearly as the BDOM network (standing for behavioral dynamics in operations management). They haven&#8217;t just added a list of publications or a bibliography of relevant publications on their website but an archive (including classifications á la content analysis) of publications on google docs &#8211; [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=686&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2010/01/18/bdom-archives-or-another-way-to-facilitate-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contemporary research themes in Operations Management, resesarch methods, and reasons for rejecting manuscripts</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/12/06/contemporary-research-themes-in-operations-management-resesarch-methods-and-reasons-for-rejecting-manuscripts/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/12/06/contemporary-research-themes-in-operations-management-resesarch-methods-and-reasons-for-rejecting-manuscripts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operations management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those who are interested in the development of research in Operations Management will find this paper by Andrew Taylor and Margaret Taylor (editors of IJOPM* during the last 5 years) relevant to their collection:

Operations management research: contemporary themes, trends and potential future directions
The paper identifies main research themes, use of research methods, and reasons for [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=653&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/12/06/contemporary-research-themes-in-operations-management-resesarch-methods-and-reasons-for-rejecting-manuscripts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/579f2792b1dc9896eb85efe06a55abb4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Interorganisational</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions of science, science and progress</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/04/15/questions-of-science-science-and-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/04/15/questions-of-science-science-and-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operations management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Authors are well advised to check out editorial policies on review processes. While you may assume sending a paper to a international &#8220;peer reviewed&#8221; journal assures you of a blind review process, some even &#8220;better&#8221; journals (such as the International Journal of Production Economics) only subscribe to a single-blind review &#8211; i.e. authors do not [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=519&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/04/15/questions-of-science-science-and-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake to impress</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/06/faking-to-impress/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/06/faking-to-impress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Social Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oddly enough, most Britons have lied about the books they&#8217;ve read in order to impress others; with a study revealing the &#8220;top ten list&#8221; of books people have lied about. The authors should be happy, even though they are not read, they are regarded as socially worth while reading. A lovely case of social desirability [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=516&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/06/faking-to-impress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>JBL seeking editor</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/05/jbl-seeking-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/05/jbl-seeking-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Journal of Business Logistics is seeking a new editor &#8211; see CSCMP&#8217;s call here. Deadline for applications: May 1, 2009
Gyöngyi
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=512&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/05/jbl-seeking-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Academic publishing workshop</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/02/27/academic-publishing-workshop/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/02/27/academic-publishing-workshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be a bit more positive about academic publishing, LIHE is planning a workshop on &#8220;Writing for journal publication&#8221; in Sep in Greece. Check it out.
Gyöngyi
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=505&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/02/27/academic-publishing-workshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The academic bubble</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/02/25/the-academic-bubble/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/02/25/the-academic-bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ring a ring o&#8217; roses&#8230; This is actually the title of a fascinating article on how to play the game of getting published, getting cited, publishing in &#8220;quality&#8221; journals etc. It is enlightening how little the quality of an article actually matters, and how we prefer where an article has been published over what it [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=501&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/02/25/the-academic-bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The woes of interdisciplinary research</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/02/06/the-woes-of-interdisciplinary-research/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/02/06/the-woes-of-interdisciplinary-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scmblogs.wordpress.com/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure whether it was Cooper, Lambert and Pagh&#8217;s first article on the supply chain management framework that debated the problem of &#8220;functional silos&#8221; first, but at least ever since, SCM researchers have been criticising companies for their organisation in these functional silos. Having said so, we researchers excel at maintaining these when it comes [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=275&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/02/06/the-woes-of-interdisciplinary-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open source review</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/01/26/open-source-review/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/01/26/open-source-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operations management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when Árni suggested to debate articles in public, as a sort of open source review? The Journal of Operations Management has indeed taken on the idea and publishes articles, and ideas for articles, in their operations and supply management forum. Some of the articles did already generate quite a number of (high quality) comments. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=475&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/01/26/open-source-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women in SCM &#8211; a survey</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2008/12/22/women-in-scm-a-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2008/12/22/women-in-scm-a-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humanitarian supply chains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operations management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanitarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, this is not about women and leadership, but yes about links between skills, gender, and logistics performance &#8211; a comparative survey of logisticians and their managers in three fields: business logistics, humanitarian logistics, and military logistics. Click here to fill in the survey &#8211; and send the link to your colleagues in the field!
Gyöngyi
PS. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=455&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2008/12/22/women-in-scm-a-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>