Here is a brief piece on Reverse Logistics I wrote for Supply Management, published in their issue from 31st January 2008.
Is Reverse the Top Gear in logistics?
Árni
Here is a brief piece on Reverse Logistics I wrote for Supply Management, published in their issue from 31st January 2008.
Is Reverse the Top Gear in logistics?
Árni
Categories: Reverse Logistics · Sustainability
Manufacturing ’strategies’ and -approaches such as flexible specialisation, lean and agile are very often explained relative to the good old mass-production and Henry Ford’s model T.
In essence, from push to pull.
At the same time, we may ask whether today’s products are inteded to bye easy and cheap to repair, which was one of the cornerstones in Ford’s ideas?
It happens that things go break down, sometimes of reasons that are beyond the control of the user/consumer.
What do you do when a 14 month old mobile phone breaks down? Or when a service light starts blinking in your car? Or when a wheel falls of your kids toy car? Do you safe old stuff for spare parts?
What happened to products that are easy and cheap to repair?
Árni
Categories: Product return · Reverse Logistics · Service management · Socks and sandals
It can sometimes be difficult to leave the research topics behind us.
Today, I was buying a digital camera, and the search was down to two similar models of different brands. The price was identical. The first salesperson we asked recommended brand A. Another salesperson came by, and he got the same question. The firm answer was: B.
After a long day of shopping, you either trust your own instinct, or rely upon the personal opinion of the salesperson that was the last one to give you an advice.
Or…you ask the reverse logistics question: About the return rate of the product, and in particular, the reason(s) why customers would be returning the product.
The salesperson started shaking his head, saying “Ohh no….no no no….you don’t want to buy this one” pointing at camera B and looking us straight into our eyes.
The decision was made.
I wonder what the reaction will be if the reverse logistics question is the first thing you ask when a friendly salesperson approaches you?
Árni
Categories: Reverse Logistics · Socks and sandals
In many textbooks and almost every major (and minor) student assignment, I read about the ever fierce competition in many industries, fueled by globalisation and IT, and of course, this does put logistics & supply chain management into the centre of the Universe.
I had one of these crazy moments of thougth at the LRN 2007 conference last week during one of the sessions. During the last 20 or 30 years, many business models in logistics call for integration and substantial reduction of redundancies (cut down inventories, etc). Well, so far so good.
Recent vocabualry in the SCM literature includes resiliance, risk, robustness, sustainability, product recalls, reverse logistics.
Is this due to the fact that the business environment is changing fast? Or can it be the case, that many ‘business models’ do not allow realistic (e.g. in terms of time and cost) reaction to changes? Further, has this new vocabulary developed as a consequence of the incompletness of the ‘old business models’, that have left businesses with a vulnerable design of their supply chain?`
In other word, and as stated in a previous blog: Is supply chain management the solution to a particular problem, or maybe the problem itself?
Árni
Categories: Reverse Logistics · Supply Chain Management · Theory
Yes, not recycling, but freecycling.
Consumers are now involving themselves into reverse logistics via an Internet based platform: uk.freecycle.org
“Freecycle groups match people who have things they want to get rid of with people who can use them” and the objective is to
“keep usable items out of landfill”.
Árni
Categories: Reverse Logistics · Sustainability
Here is an interesting blog on recycling that also contains some practical information, especially for those who live and work in the UK.
Árni
Categories: Carbon management · Reverse Logistics · Sustainability
This is the sustainability discourse entering the world of womens magazines: “green is the new black” (and we thought “black was the new black” a while ago; and yes, even your sanitary items might get affected by this fashion dictate).
Anyway, green is the new black (funnily one of the “eco-friendly” clothing lines being called Noir). As a difference to previous fashion statements, the reference is not to the colour but to “sustainable” clothing lines. Interestingly, instead of waste management and the end-of-pipe solutions of second hand clothing, this means that companies are either closing the loop of their supply chain (as in discovering the benefits of recycling), or go as far as to redesign their products and the choice of suppliers (see “organic jeans” etc.). Who says reading fashion magazines wouldn’t teach you a lesson in supply chain management?
Gyöngyi
Categories: Reverse Logistics · Supply Chain Management · Sustainability
Network economy. Knowledge economy. Information economy. Global economy. Creative economy. Information age. Network society. (I must be forgetting something).
And now: Low carbon economy.
Environmental issues have been discussed eagerly by politicians in the UK press this week; low carbon economy is the “buzz-phrase” according to this piece from BBC. Not without a reason according to these pictures, which project dramatic changes in surface temperature over the next century. Human activity is quoted as a “very likely” cause for this change.
In the literature on supply chain management we find the word green as one of the labels for environmental concerns. This recent paper by S. K. Srivastava “Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review” (The latest issue of International Journal of Management Reviews) presents a comprehensive review of the literature within the realm of “green supply chain management”. (A useful overview for those who are working on reverse logistics, waste management, recyling and remanufacturing).
One of the conclusions in this paper is that:
“One of the biggest challenges facing the field of GrSCM is extending the historical ‘common wisdom’ about managing operations. Much research, management education and many practical applications have focused on buffering the operations function from external influences, including the natural environment, in order to improve efficiencies, reduce cost and increase quality. When the natural environment is considered, it is typically recognized or modelled as an external constraint, requiring operations to work within prescribed limits. Once this basic assumption is relaxed, a fundamental question arises about how to pursue research on green issues in operations: should this be considered a separate research stream with its own strategic framework or should green issues be integrated into existing operations management research frameworks and areas? While the complexity of green issues might favour the former approach, the greatest contributions can be achieved by pursuing opportunities within a more integrative framework.” (our emphasis in bold).
Environmental responsibility is considered as one of the operations challenges in a textbook I am using as a core text in a Operations Management course. It is presented on five pages at the last chapter of the book as a part of The operations challenge. I decided to include this chapter (and topic) at the beginning of the course to emphasise the environmental issue that relates to Operations Management. Still, I have found it difficult (or rather complex, cf. the notion made by Srivastava) to integrate this aspect into the current models and approaches in such textbook.
Can we expect a textbook that provides an integrative framework on environmental issues?
Árni
Categories: Reverse Logistics · Sustainability
This piece from yesterday´s FT demonstrates one but several ways of how reverse logistics activities may be involved in moving desks.
“Last week I gathered up seven years of my working life and threw it away. I filled three plastic sacks of miscellaneous rubbish for landfill sites and one oil drum of paper for recycling and built six tottering towers of books to be sent to Oxfam.“
Here, sorting is carried out, and destination for various end-of-life products are determined.
“Moving meant a major sorting operation. First, I tackled a job I had been putting off for years: opening my mail. My policy is never to open anything unless it looks interesting. The pile of uninteresting mail was therefore very large, some of the envelopes having been posted several years earlier.“
Who is not guilty of such gate-keeping but time-saving activity? What is though interesting here is that this confirms how difficult it is to forecast when and how end-of-life materials enter the reverse supply chain. How often do we not open our mail, but still decide keep it somewhere? How often do we move desks? There are many sources of uncertainty for materials as simple as paper.
“When I started to open them I discovered how right I had been. They contained invitations to dull leadership seminars and press releases about dull surveys. I took an executive decision and slung the rest, unopened, into the oil drum, where it made a reassuring thud. This felt very good.“
Just carry on reading!
“Then the old newspapers and magazines followed. Thud, thud. Next were books, so many management books of so very little interest. The first I picked up was Value Nets, Breaking the Supply Chain to Unlock Hidden Profits. The question was not whether to keep it now but why I had ever kept it at all. About a hundred other titles followed.”
Now, this is why we need “reverse supply chains”
Maybe demand management could solve this problem of reverse logistics?!
Árni
Categories: Reverse Logistics · Sustainability