<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Interorganisational                                 - Supply Chain Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://interorganisational.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://interorganisational.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:14:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
			<item>
		<title>Now: Euroma 2009</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/17/now-euroma-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/17/now-euroma-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operations management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Meet the editors&#8221; at Euroma: JOM and (the new) IJOPM editors declared in unison that they were most interested in theory-driven, empirically based papers. In other words, nothing that does not take its parameters at least from an actual empirical study, and nothing that just suggest yet another (consultancy) &#8216;methodology&#8217;. Well, IJOPM did add their [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=551&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/17/now-euroma-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trendspotting: what is hot and what is not</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/14/trendspotting-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/14/trendspotting-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trendspotting is a lovely sport. In research you can look at conference tracks, topics of current calls for papers, conduct your own survey on trends, or have a glance on which articles are downloaded the most. Downloads are interesting as they reveal not only what is read but implicitly, which topics academics currently work on. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=549&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/14/trendspotting-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now: Nofoma 2009 back to basics</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/11/now-nofoma-2009-back-to-basics/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/11/now-nofoma-2009-back-to-basics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nofoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socks and sandals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The theme of the year is &#8220;innovation in logistics&#8221;, not entirely surprising at a university where logistics is under the department of entrepreneurship (JIBS&#8217; EMM department). The probably most interesting paper under the theme was on logistics innovation at Mackay memorial hospital. But apart from this, the conference theme could (especially after last year&#8217;s &#8220;beyond [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=547&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/11/now-nofoma-2009-back-to-basics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCM theory and practice &#8211; what comes first?</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/08/scm-theory-and-practice-what-comes-first/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/08/scm-theory-and-practice-what-comes-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scientific explanation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socks and sandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can supply chain management work well in practice without drawing on &#8216;theories of supply chain management&#8217;? 
Árni 
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=545&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/06/08/scm-theory-and-practice-what-comes-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/579f2792b1dc9896eb85efe06a55abb4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Interorganisational</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading club</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/05/27/reading-club/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/05/27/reading-club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education & Management Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socks and sandals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether at the local library, online on facebook, or as a tv show, there are lots and lots of reading clubs. Tolkien belonged to one. Kids have their own. Academics have their own rules. Princeton even awarded Oprah an honorary doctorate in 2002, partly for her online reading club! Allegedly an idea at the Universities [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=538&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/05/27/reading-club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions of science, science and progress</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/04/15/questions-of-science-science-and-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/04/15/questions-of-science-science-and-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operations management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Authors are well advised to check out editorial policies on review processes. While you may assume sending a paper to a international &#8220;peer reviewed&#8221; journal assures you of a blind review process, some even &#8220;better&#8221; journals (such as the International Journal of Production Economics) only subscribe to a single-blind review &#8211; i.e. authors do not [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=519&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/04/15/questions-of-science-science-and-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logistics dissertation awards once again</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/04/07/logistics-dissertation-awards-once-again/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/04/07/logistics-dissertation-awards-once-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SOLE as well as LRN have just announced their deadlines for logistics dissertation awards: Apr 24 (forms/applications to Stanley Griffis) and May 22 (forms/applications to Sarah Skinns), respectively.
Gyöngyi
Edit on Apr 15: The 2009 Emerald/EFMD Outstanding Doctoral Research Awards are also up to grab, with the application deadline being Oct 1, 2009.
     [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=524&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/04/07/logistics-dissertation-awards-once-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must all inventories be &#8220;eliminated&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/11/must-all-inventories-be-eliminated/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/11/must-all-inventories-be-eliminated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Socks and sandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a bit troubled with the representation of &#8220;lean&#8221; and &#8220;just-in-time&#8221; in various core textbooks. What students read far too often is that all inventories are waste and must be eliminated. 
&#8220;First you identify the waste, then you elimiate it&#8221;.  
Without recognising that inventories do have a role to play, and that role [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=520&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/11/must-all-inventories-be-eliminated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/579f2792b1dc9896eb85efe06a55abb4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Interorganisational</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake to impress</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/06/faking-to-impress/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/06/faking-to-impress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Social Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oddly enough, most Britons have lied about the books they&#8217;ve read in order to impress others; with a study revealing the &#8220;top ten list&#8221; of books people have lied about. The authors should be happy, even though they are not read, they are regarded as socially worth while reading. A lovely case of social desirability [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=516&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/06/faking-to-impress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>JBL seeking editor</title>
		<link>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/05/jbl-seeking-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/05/jbl-seeking-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyoengyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interorganisational.org/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Journal of Business Logistics is seeking a new editor &#8211; see CSCMP&#8217;s call here. Deadline for applications: May 1, 2009
Gyöngyi
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=interorganisational.org&blog=604533&post=512&subd=scmblogs&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://interorganisational.org/2009/03/05/jbl-seeking-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2938aebea1abe877300a8db463eaaefa?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gyoengyi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>